Signature Extensions Preserve Termination - An Alternative Proof via Dependency Pairs
نویسندگان
چکیده
We give the first mechanized proof of the fact that for showing termination of a term rewrite system, we may restrict to well-formed terms using just the function symbols actually occurring in the rules of the system. Or equivalently, termination of a term rewrite system is preserved under signature extensions. We did not directly formalize the existing proofs for this well-known result, but developed a new and more elegant proof by reusing facts about dependency pairs. We also investigate signature extensions for termination proofs that use dependency pairs. Here, we were able to develop counterexamples which demonstrate that signature extensions are unsound in general. We further give two conditions where signature extensions are still possible.
منابع مشابه
Proving and Disproving Termination of Higher-Order Functions
The dependency pair technique is a powerful modular method for automated termination proofs of term rewrite systems (TRSs). We present two important extensions of this technique: First, we show how to prove termination of higher-order functions using dependency pairs. To this end, the dependency pair technique is extended to handle (untyped) applicative TRSs. Second, we introduce a method to pr...
متن کاملAC Dependency Pairs Revisited
Rewriting modulo AC, i.e., associativity and/or commutativity of certain symbols, is among the most frequently used extensions of term rewriting by equational theories. In this paper we present a generalization of the dependency pair framework for termination analysis to rewriting modulo AC. It subsumes existing variants of AC dependency pairs, admits standard dependency graph analyses, and in ...
متن کاملShallow Dependency Pairs
We show how the dependency pair approach, commonly used to modularize termination proofs of rewrite systems, can be adapted to establish termination of recursive functions in a system like Isabelle/HOL or Coq. It turns out that all that is required are two simple lemmas about wellfoundedness.
متن کاملAProVE: A System for Proving Termination
The system AProVE (Automated Program Verification Environment) can be used for automated termination and innermost termination proofs of (conditional) term rewrite systems (TRSs). AProVE currently offers the techniques of recursive path orders possibly with status [3] (Sect. 2), dependency pairs including recent refinements such as narrowing, rewriting, and instantiation of dependency pairs [1,...
متن کاملA Formalization of Termination Techniques in Isabelle/HOL
There are many automatic tools to prove termination of term rewrite systems, nowadays. Most of these tools use a combination of many complex termination criteria. Hence generated proofs may be of tremendous size, which makes it very tedious (if not impossible) for humans to check those proofs for correctness. In this paper we use the theorem prover Isabelle/HOL to automatically certify terminat...
متن کامل